Eyes of the Storm

There is something singularly unsettling about having something as personal as a disabled child at the center of a public firestorm like the one about thimerisol and vaccines. Parents and scientists and doctors make complicated, impassioned arguments on either side. And in the midst of it all are photos of these children, standing still, their eyes fixed for a moment or an hour in the mysteriously clear, oddly beautiful gaze that is the hallmark of autism.

A child with autism, almost by definition, requires that parents enlist help from multiple professionals inside and outside their homes in order to give their child the greatest chance of success against this baffling disorder. Our private struggle, where it comes from and how we address it, is now a matter of public debate, and our gratitude for the attention and services that our children are getting is tempered by the knowledge that they signify a dangerous and mysterious trend that leaves us constantly searching and hoping for more information, better interventions and research that will discover a cause if not a cure. The price of that help, for those of us lucky enough to get it, is the very public exposure of our private pain.

Most of us take for granted that we can raise our families in the privacy of our own homes, getting our parenting advice from family friends, books and Oprah as we see fit, but once you have a child with special needs, your child becomes a line item on the school budget, the state budget and becomes part of the debate surrounding no child left behind. If you advocate for disability awareness, the newspaper calls and wants to put a picture of you and your child in the newspaper. In the name of forwarding the debate and getting funding for services and research you want to say yes, but for the sake of the rest of your family you want to say no. Your quest for something resembling a normal life takes on a whole new meaning as that pursuit becomes a media event; it is at once energizing and demoralizing because you are shouting to the now attentive world that you need help when what every parent wants is to be everything their child needs.

Every time some brave family allows their story to be told, a piece of yours is out there, too. You recognize the daily schedules, the alternative therapies, the trips to McDonald’s. The articles show up in your mail and your e-mail, and there is always a photo, and there are those dreamy eyes looking at or just beyond you. You read it sometimes warily, sometimes hungrily, wondering if that family is doing something you have done or should try doing, to bring your child into focus a little more.

And once you do speak out as a parent the quest feeds on itself. As the years go by you go to parties or functions and realize that you are almost incapable of talking about anything else, and you wonder if you are losing yourself to something different than the disability, and so you turn away from the public realm only to be met by those mesmerizing eyes and know that you have to fight for the child behind them.

There is a long history of crackpot theories about autism. Back in 1999 when I was learning about it, I read many articles that said that some parents are deluded into thinking that there is a working mind trapped inside of the autistic child, but actually the autistic brain really is empty. We all know now that they were wrong. Bruno Bettleheim said that uncaring mothers cause autism. He was wrong, too. Think of it this way: Those who look askance at vaccines are only following through on something many people do every day when they read a label on a food or medicine package. The labeling laws are there because we all agree that what is good – or at least not harmful – for one person may be deadly to another. Tree nuts, acetaminophen, lactose, and gluten all make some people healthier and other people sick, so why should it surprise anyone that there are some people who cannot tolerate certain vaccines or the preservative in them? Of course parents are at the forefront of the debate because we are also the ones riding the crest of the wave of the autism epidemic. Our futures as families with autistic children are already cemented – discovery of a cause or an environmental trigger will not soon reveal a cure – but there is something compelling in the hope that by asking the right questions we can reverse the trend.

And so we expose our turbulent lives to the extent that we can to the teachers, therapists, physicians, reporters, lawyers and politicians who can help us maximize our children’s education in the present as we try to build a future. We don’t have the luxury to entertain the parental conceit that we can make a life for our children that is somehow better than ours, for we are building a new world from scratch, one that will celebrate, welcome and soothe the vagaries of the autistic mind. The eyes have it.

The Curse of the Palladium Window

The house at the top of the next street over is for sale. Again. Built in spot where no one in their right mind would want to live – the driveway is so steep you practically have to repel down it if you are on foot and in winter requires nothing short of a Humvee. It is a four bedroom McMansion monstrosity built at the bottom of a steep incline next to a busy state highway. A spec house colonial with a palladium window slapped over the front door, the view from every front window is of the weedy retaining wall that supports the busy road 100 feet above. The other side faces a lovely little pond, but because it is a spec house none of the windows on that side were properly modified to take advantage of that view. Inside, real estate agent photos show a lifeless box with some nice wood floors and trendy paint along with the ubiquitous granite kitchen. No photos of the views because the windows are in all the wrong places.
This dwelling – if you can call it that – epitomizes the crass greed of the housing bubble. The developer sold it to someone coming off an ugly divorce in the midwest who thought she could redecorate it and flip it, not realizing that once the snow fell she’d be virtually housebound. After the bank foreclosed and sold it at auction in 2007 the second buyer still didn’t understand how overvalued the house remained and how living under a highway would set her and her dogs on the slow and inexorable road to insanity. Eventually she put in some geraniums and put up the for sale sign.
I drive by the entrance to this house in a hole several times each day and cannot help but think of a person imprisoned down there – it’s like Horton Hears a Who, I imagine a voice coming up from the pit: “We are here, we are here, we are here!!” Another strange thing is that both owners have been single people living alone. What gives with the four bedroom house for one person?
The whole thing feels wrong, and this sense of unbalance irks me every day because, well, this cannot end happily for someone, perhaps anyone, who chooses to live in this home. Whoever lives there is trapped in the cycle of bleak, icy New England winters, even darker down in the hole, and social isolation. Or if the house is left empty – as it was for over a year at one point – it becomes blighted and sad. It is either abandoned or for sale for over a half million dollars. The best fit for this house – as a starter home for a young family that can enjoy the water and make the trek up the hill – is unlikely because the outstanding mortgage is so high and the taxes are based on the pre-crash value of the house.
I want us to remake this house, this nation, on a scale in keeping with its place in nature. It could have been a little cottage on a pond; now it’s an eyesore next to the highway and destined to stay that way.

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑